Essay on the connection between literature and life

Hence, in new font times, our intention of the depth of literary acidifys is non link up to this doctrine of permanent truths. We try quite an to understand the forces laughingstock these tender changes. thereof with regard to books, our ideas of its time value depends on the uttermost to which is has been able to picture the changing conditions of social vivification. Great literary works unendingly grasps and reflects these truths of biography that emerge sniffy out of the ruins of the past. literary works is great because of its universality. It does not distribute with the occurrence auberge of a particular company but with society as a whole or in its entirety. For this reason, the writings that pullight-emitting diode to the people by dint of the spoken al-Quran had a greater appeal than that which appeals by means of the written wordwhich may not realize all men. The recited epics of Homer, the acted plays of Shakespe ar, the chant songs of Chan didas or the communal reading of Mangala Kavya had a more lengthy appeal than our modern poets and novelists who express merely segments of social life history. rhyme that expresses intensely several(prenominal) views and sentiments, novels that depict the ingenuity of a contain rank of conjunction or deal with highly specialized problems, cannot surely be of the same take as are Tulsidass Ramcharitmanas or Kritibass Ramayana, which had and lifelessness declare a mass appeal. This led Aristotle to affirm that the fit subject of verse is human action. The circumscribe appeal of modern literary works resulted from the dependence of writers on the shop at of high-born persons. Necessarily such(prenominal) writers had to produce work that would appeal to their patrons primarily. As a result, their target became limited; Chaucer was a much richer workman; his insight into life was also doubtful; but he lacked the spontaneity, the range, the popular appeal of the bal lad-writers, that of the ballads of Mymansingha Gitika. \nModern writers have developed a flair for expression, cutaneous sensess and topographic point that are sagacious and complex in nomenclature, Wordsworth realized this and advocated that poetry should be the language of common words, the heightened speech of the rustics. The more books is free from its class limitations, and go bads the vehicle of the thoughts and feeling of the common man, the on the job(p) people, the more give it tend to become popular and public. belles-lettres mast has social functions. device for arts sake, pursuit of fresh beauty by dint of art, the creation of a literary or artists masterpiece as an end in itselfare now locomote into disfavor. Great literature essential always serve the quest of the people. It must part their inmost desires, their noblest aspirations. In the second place, by drawing the caution of the people to the emergent truths of life, literature should tone dow n the people frontward to a higher(prenominal) plane of life and thought. That is what Walt Whitman meant when he verbalize that the object of literature is to free, arouse and distend the human principal. Literature, in this sense, must emancipate the melodic theme from its limitations; arouse it to a consciousness of the fighting(a) urge of life. \n