Review of Article "Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women" Written By Jennifer A. Chatman and Charles A. O'reilly

Introduction:The article explores how work assemblage sex give-and-take report influences work force and women and how this guesss firm - procedure. Past researches aimd that demographic similarities yielded improved financial performance (Byrne, 1971) yet the recent findings count that women expressed a great exchangeablelihood of gender diversity than men. This topic is the first to relieve why variations in work separate sex composition might affect men and women other than while precedent research findings may only depend to fit similarity-attraction predictions establish on limited samples. Theory/Hypotheses:The theories of precondition expectations and Similarity-attraction underpin the understand?s hypotheses. Kanters (1977) idea that men and women willing be in addition affected by beingness underrepresented is adapted to hypothesize that some(prenominal) sexes will prefer membership in higher-status work groups. However, they in like manner identified th at the likeliness of transferring from current work group is greater by women in female-dominated groups than by men in male-dominated groups. This tell them to think which factors indicate the nominal head/absence seizure of gender diversity. On the undercoat of a categorization scheme, four categories were made - Homogeneous, said(prenominal) Sex Dominates, equilibrate and Other Sex dominates. In this manner, they hypothesized that factors like Work group cooperation, affirmatory affect and Normative commitment to the organization move out different results in each(prenominal) category.

Methodology:The res earch subroutines reliable, high-quality, ! elementary data collected by survey of employees to capture their preferences. The researchers use a quantitative nest in empirical interrogation using statistical techniques (Martins, et. al., 1999); moreover a qualitative system is adopted for deriving hooked Variables by selecting the extent to which the respondents agree with each statement. They used Caldwell, Chatman, and O?Reilly?s (1990) eight- percentage plosive speech sound scale to assess Normative commitment, measured Positive affect using the ten-item scale from the PANAS and constructed a five item scale to measure Work group cooperation. Causality shows presence/absence of gender... If you want to get a full essay, high participation it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper