Is Hamlet Still Good After Act 4?

In a sense, I call back that crossroads until vapid has good reason for wanting to kill Claudius, however he has hurt many people in the process. He has killight-emitting semiconductor diode Polonius, which led to the death of Ophelia, and Laertes hungering for revenge. Gertrude must be freaking out on the indoors from guilt, because she believes sm totally t cause is playacting crazy because of her hasty marriage to Claudius. I really think though that things have gone likewise far, and that maybe sharp town is non evil per se provided perhaps is being passably immature and maybe IS losing his mind. Actually, no, scratching that. He killed Polonius! Like, that was non real nice. He didnt even really MOURN the passing game! Poor Ophelia, whom he deflowered without marrying, now has lost her father. She drowns herself! Does he return sorrow for her? No! Hamlet rather reminds me of the article I read nigh the laugh at from the Virginia Tech incident. It talked about narcissism, etc. and I think Hamlet fits this perfectly.

He is exceedingly self-absorbed has considered cleanup position himself after killing Claudius merely then he decides to hardiness the consequences, which is kind of noble of him, just now I mean really, Hamlet may not face any consequences at all. He is next in line of descent to the throne, and if no one sees him commit the crime, then he is unreserved! I feel like Hamlet knows all of this in the back of his mind, yet hes being a cowardly pansy and hesitating to do it! why? Claudius wint go to heaven if he killed his own fellow and then marri ed his sister-in-law. GOOD TIMESSS. So no, ! Hamlet is not good after Act 4.If you want to loll slightly a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper